A Water Company Is Getting Blamed for Rick Snyder’s Actions in Flint Water Lawsuit

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette filed a lawsuit in civil court against an engineering company and a private water business. According to the civil suit, these companies carry the responsibility for the Flint water crisis. Critics of the crisis have pointed out that this lawsuit could be another way that Governor Rick Snyder can avoid taking the blame for the lead-tainted water in Flint.

The Lawsuit Against Veolia

faucet-1581573_960_720Veolia is a private water corporation that was hired by the city of Flint in February of 2015 to test the city’s drinking water quality. At the time, this was a year after the city switched to the Flint River and failed to add corrosion control chemicals to prevent lead pipes from producing lead in the water. The report created by Veolia said that the city’s water was in compliance with federal and state regulations. Furthermore, the report never mentioned the topic of using corrosion control chemicals.

In the lawsuit, the attorneys allege that Veolia encouraged the public health crisis because the lack of recommendations caused lead to leech even worse. The company allegedly committed fraud by making misleading statements to the public about the safety of the water. In addition, the lawsuit alleges that professional negligence was a cause because the company should have known that the water needed to be treated in order to prevent corrosion.

Veolia’s Response

Veolia recently released a statement that said that the allegations were inaccurate. According to Veolia, the work that they did was unrelated to lead. Instead, Veolia stated that they were hired to look at byproducts from disinfection chemicals and complaints of a bad odor. Copper and lead testing were not even included within the company’s scope of work because the city said that someone else would take care of that part of the analysis.

LAN’s Response

Meanwhile, another party to the lawsuit has stated that the state is completely mischaracterizing LAN’s services in Flint. According to LAN, it was the city’s choice to not use anti-corrosion chemicals. In reality, LAN says that they regularly recommended that the city begin using corrosion control and test the system.

Advocates in Michigan are primarily on the side of the defense. They believe that the state is using the lawsuit to remove blame from the people who are actually responsible for Flint’s lead crisis. Rather than absolving Governor Snyder of blame, advocates believe that all parties who are at fault should be held responsible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *